CO129-542-3 Foreshore and Sea-bed Works Bill- correspondence 9-1-1933 - 16-8-1933 — Page 41

overnor.

41

I would not send 3 to the Some of the minor points have already been considered,

e do not wish it to apear that the

the

Λ

decision of the S.of S. on general prin-

ciple was inspired by the Chima Association,

or that the .0. apprehensions originated f

-

though I suspect

from the same source

they did. (The suggestion that we should

get in touch with the appropriate depart-

ment of the .0. seems to imply prior

discussion with that department.

urt her,

the Association admit that they would

have preferred to consult the L.A. Chamber

of Commerce before submitting obserrations

on tie ill.

reply to 33 with a reference to 36,

and suggest that, in view of the terms of

para. 14 of the ir letter, they should now

invite the 4.A. Chamber of Commerce to

lay their views before the

As proposed on 32.

overnor.

HRlowell

18.8.33

a cappy

I saw have sent a for.

ce

of the carreep with the Cavia

axxde".

routine

as

Q

but

matter of

av Lavell Дайрг

sees objection,

wis view.

as aragded

by adfowell.

Acep

09.8.33

athull